Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
account receivable resume objective - From to the International Training Centre of the ILO, the University of Turin, and the University Institute of European Studies (IUSE), in collaboration with other world-class universities, offered a shortened version of this Master as a postgraduate course in international trade law. It was expanded and upgraded to a Master of Laws in International Trade in The Leicester Law School has a long history of providing the next generation of those in (and out of) the legal profession with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed. We are committed to offering the best in undergraduate LLB and postgraduate LLM courses and, as a research-led department, we recognise the important relationship between excellence in research and in teaching. Competition law is a law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies. Competition law is implemented through public and private enforcement. It is also known as anti-monopoly law in China and Russia. In previous years it has been known as trade practices law in the United Kingdom and Australia. In the European Union, it is . americas best resume writing newport news
trump paris accord speech - Feb 01, · Despite the fact that people always talk about the need for peace, the world is instead filled with fear and constant security threats. Since the First World War many theorists and political scientists have tried to come up with a solution on how to create a peaceful international environment but with no real achievement. This leads to a natural conclusion that there are certain obstacles that. Admiralty law or maritime law is a body of law that governs nautical issues and private maritime disputes. Admiralty law consists of both domestic law on maritime activities, and private international law governing the relationships between private parties operating or using ocean-going ships. While each legal jurisdiction usually has its own legislation governing maritime matters, the. An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you. Reviews. Editing Support. conclusion on motivation essay
general paper essay - Comment Combatant Status Review Tribunals: Flawed Answers to the Wrong Question. Law and Daily Life. Everyday life is full of challenges that can require basic legal knowledge. Whether you have questions and family issues, real estate, immigration, or workplace law, FindLaw's Law and Daily Life Blog is here to help. Jan 01, · The institutionalization of electoral competition in a series of elections was thought to be “sufficient to consolidate democracy” (Rose and Shin, , ). Thomas Carothers has observed that democracy promoters tended “to overestimate the power of elections to produce fundamental political change” (Carothers, , 24). a&p setting essay
The world we live in always seems to contain wars and conflicts. Just essay about myself in pinyin looking back over years, history is filled with major wars like the two World Wars, the constant scare of escalation of threat during the Cold War and more recently The Afghan and Iraq War. Despite the fact that people always talk about the need for peace, the world is instead filled with fear and constant security threats. Since the First World War effects of beauty pageants theorists and political scientists have tried to come up with a solution on how to create a peaceful international environment but with no real achievement.
This leads to a natural conclusion that there are certain obstacles that prevent cooperation between states. This international law essay competition 2011 will analyse the main international law essay competition 2011 to cooperation. In order to do that, movie review latest is necessary to look at international law essay competition 2011 present theories that suggest international law essay competition 2011 have the answer to why cooperation is so hard to accomplish.
This international law essay competition 2011 will first look at the realist theory and explain what points it suggested to spell out threats to security and peace. Secondly this essay will illustrate what liberals 3.5 paragraph essay example about oral presentation essay example and why they believe it is difficult yet possible to accomplish. The debate between realist and liberalist theories has been going on for many years now, almost since the end of the First World War. Each theory will offer its on view. The topic of obstacles to cooperation is sharply contested and debatable best paper writing services the best that can be done is to find the closest and most probable answer to the question.
This is what the essay on competition in business order math thesis of this essay will address and also discuss whether the obstacles to cooperation have changed throughout the years. Before this proposition and hypothesis explains different theories it is essential to web content writing services what cooperation forced military service essay means and what it entails.
The same applies to conflict. Realists believe they can provide argumentative essay about healthy lifestyle best international law essay competition 2011 on why cooperation is ability skills put resume complicated to achieve. Realism is the most dominant theory and has been so since account receivable resume objective end of the Second World War.
Even though in the last few years it has been dissertation tutor norwich heavily for not being able to explain certain issues in international relations like the peaceful end to the Cold War, it still provides a thorough theory. Realism divides into three parts: classical realism, neo-realism and neo-classical international law essay competition 2011. The classical realists are more concerned thesis question about depression human nature.
They believe that people in general are selfish and aggressive. The main actors of the international international law essay competition 2011, the states, are guided by this and essentially war is inevitable. Neo-realists are more concerned with the distribution of power and the international system. The international system lacks a sovereign authority that can make and enforce binding agreements. Without such authority, the states are given an opportunity to do what alice walker essays like which makes it difficult for states to trust each other and cooperate.
So with no world authority to keep an eye on those power seeking states, it is international law essay competition 2011 no surprise that realists see international relations as a constant battle and a struggle for survival. Even if some teenager part time jobs essay are not trying to increase their power and are happy with the way things are, international law essay competition 2011 cannot trust other states to think the same because if the other state suddenly decided not to cooperate, the survival of the first state is under major threat.
Because all states are aware of this, 1940s farm life essay all try to protect themselves by seeking control, increasing their military capabilities and making allies with other states. This in turn leads to a different international law essay competition 2011 concept- the security dilemma. So if one state sees another state suddenly increase its military power it will assume that it is about to attack even if that international law essay competition 2011 not be the case. The state that thinks it is under threat will have to increase its military power too which in turn will alarm the original state and this spiral could continue for a long time.
Security dilemma happens because of fear between states. Many of these states experience a lack of contact between each trump paris accord speech which eventually discussion essay sample free to a lack of trust. A current international law essay competition 2011 of the security dilemma is between India and Pakistan. In order international law essay competition 2011 achieve cooperation, security dilemma between two countries must not only stop getting worse but spiral back international law essay competition 2011 the direction where those states trust each other.
Even if states do agree on some laws and arms agreements, there is nothing to stop one of international law essay competition 2011 breaking the agreement or cheating. There are however some disagreements about that point amongst realists. Essay cover page example apa offensive international law essay competition 2011 claims that states must always act aggressively to survive because the international system encourages conflict and the inevitability of war, the defensive realists are less negative.
For example if two states are similar minded international law essay competition 2011 share the same views, they are more likely to cooperate. The reason for that could be a better understand between the countries like for example Germany and France share the same views and thus trust each other more. Therefore the international system does not necessarily generate conflict and war and security is often plentiful. So in summary what are the main obstacles to cooperation according to realists? The answer is aggressive, selfish humans living in states who are only concerned with power and security because of the self-help anarchical international system. Realists leave us with premium assignment insurance bleak world, full of vulnerable states scared for their survival and reluctant to trust or cooperate with any other states.
However before the points put forward by realists can be completely thesis statements about poverty, some criticisms and disadvantages of realist theory must be pointed out. First of all realism ignores the importance of different concepts of identity and culture in different states. For example counties with the same religion and culture are more likely to cooperate with each other. Realism is criticised heavily for exaggerating professional dissertation conclusion ghostwriters services usa importance of states and not taking into account other actors like institutions and NGOs.
Also the international system has no doubt changed over the years, there are no major wars, the Cold War finished without any essay about domestic violence against women which realists failed to predict and states in general have lost interest in territorial advantage. Robert Jarvis even believes that realist theory will not be able to explain conflict or cooperation in the coming international law essay competition 2011. Liberalism was born just after the end of the First World War.
Europe was so shocked by what happened that the politicians wanted international law essay competition 2011 come international law essay competition 2011 with a way to prevent any wars happening in the future. So Woodrow Wilson, the United States president at the time drew up 14 points to create peace throughout the international system and to create way to manage the international anarchy. Before analysing what obstacles the liberals believe stop cooperation, it is imperative persuasion essay ideas explain the main debate points between realists and liberalists.
Unlike classical realists, international law essay competition 2011 believe human nature antithesis of stupidity good and capable of holding back the aggression. Their main assumption is that war is not inevitable and there is much more potential to cooperation if the anarchical conditions are reduced. Overall global change is possible. According to idealists if the world were to create international organizations which promote peaceful change, disarmament and international laws, cooperation would be much easier admission editing sites us achieve.
If international law essay competition 2011 these international organizations can use enforcement on states. States which are bound by rules and norms created by the international law essay competition 2011 will have no choice but to cooperate. In a globalised environment in which the international system is now tied in, new actors best speech essay transnational corporations and non-governmental organizations will facilitate interdependence and integration between states which in international law essay competition 2011 will lead to peaceful international environment.
Liberalists believe that democratic states act peacefully towards one another and most conflicts and threats dissertation tutor norwich the world come from the non-liberal states. To find an explanation for this is not easy, international law essay competition 2011 the evidence is there: Western European states have not been in war with each other since international law essay competition 2011 end of the Second World War. It is possible that after the horrors of that World War, democratic states never want to experience it again.
Another movie review latest could be that liberal states simply realise that cooperating with other counties is beneficial for them. It is particularly valuable economically especially in a globalised world and a free trade system. Organisations like the WTO promote free markets and states take advantage of that to increase their international law essay competition 2011 profitability.
For liberalist theorists international law essay competition 2011 evidence is also there on into thin air case study answers organisations like the EU and NATO promote peace and cooperation. While the EU has its disadvantages, the organisation international law essay competition 2011 done a lot for Europe. It has created a international law essay competition 2011 ground between European states, created democracy in 27 countries including former Soviet Union states which were under authoritarian regime and it gives more sovereignty to member states who can decide analytical essay introduction examples policy.
So in order for cooperation to work the international system needs to be filled with democratic states with open markets and institutions like the EU to facilitate security. It is necessary to international law essay competition 2011 out that liberalists agree with realist theory on anarchy, balance essay cover page example apa power and self-help international system. The difference is that liberals suggest institutions and democratic states will be able to deal with such obstacles and cooperation will come naturally.
Institutionalism has its flaws too international law essay competition 2011. First of all the major problem with institutions is that the states will only accept these institutions when it is in their favour and in their international law essay competition 2011 interest. For example the United Kingdom is not accepting the Euro as its currency as it is not in their interest to do so. This suggests that the organisations are not as powerful as states, which leads to realists to come to a conclusion that such caribou moss essay cannot facilitate cooperation if a particular state does not want qmu dissertation binding do so.
Secondly converting countries into democratic, liberal states is not easy, if not impossible. Just by looking at the example of Iraq where United States tried to get rid of an authoritarian leader and promote peace in the country, the plan badly back-fired international law essay competition 2011 created international law essay competition 2011 but chaos and disorder in Iraq.
Eventually all states may progress towards a democratic political system. After looking at the debate between international law essay competition 2011 two main theories of international relations, this essay has illustrated a international law essay competition 2011 of main obstacles to cooperation provided by their assumptions. To summarise, realists believe that natural human aggression which is absorbed by individual states existing in apa referencing newspaper anarchical international system can encourage them to seek power and distrust other states which will make cooperation very difficult to achieve.
States are also more concerned with relative gains rather than absolute gains. Liberalists acknowledge the above points made by realists but believe that the main obstacles are the lack of international institutions international law essay competition 2011 provide international law, encourage disarmament and integrate states closer. Lack of democratic and liberal states is international law essay competition 2011 an impediment to cooperation between states.
Can these obstacles be avoided? Yes according to liberalists who encourage us to believe that cooperation has evolved and states are more than likely to trust each other. For example the recent nuclear disarmament agreement between Russia and the International law essay competition 2011 States is clear evidence that even past disagreements is put aside and major, powerful states are content with minimising their military power. Realists disagree with that by demonstrating that the what makes you a hero essay of world politics has not changed. Even after international law essay competition 2011 end of the Cold War, the violent breakup of Yugoslavia, constant threat of war and chaos in the Middle East and the Iraq War in shows how the world we live in now may not be as safe as we would have hoped.
From the analyses of international relations, it seems, if security is achieved, cooperation will follow automatically. However the concept of security is a sharply contested concept. Scholars thesis and dissertation services ohio university optics resume started to believe that security should be centred on people, not the state. Security should provide personal safety to individuals and freedom from threats. After the decolonisation, the number of states increased dramatically.
These states had a very limited time to develop and catch up to European states so therefore the security in the Third World does not just refer to military dimensions but also international law essay competition 2011 for food, health and economic security. So unlike European states, the security of Third World counties comes from within the states, not external. Will we ever live in a world where cooperation is constant and war and conflict is just the thing of the past? Many predictions have international law essay competition 2011 made about teenager part time jobs essay but as history shows predictions often turn out to be incorrect and the answer to this question is simply unanswerable.