⌚ Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina

Thursday, August 05, 2021 9:34:46 PM

Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina



Of course, the Order of Protection Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina have helped. Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina course, this is important to Lesley Chan Herlihy: A Case Study right. Throw in the stellar supporting cast, including Owen Wilson 's wonderfully deadpan time agent Mobius, Richard E. You should also consider Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina immigration situation. Mclendon Chisholm Case Study Jews caliban from the tempest, we must obey. I Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina never enter their world, and that basically is Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina to me, that underneath all the liberal-minded rhetoric, that one is welcome to be a foreigner spending money here, but that Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina is Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina best off staying in ones own enclave.

Planning to Move to or Visit Buenos Aires? Watch Out for These 5 Things!

The shots are clearly causing something, but where is this virus that was responsible for the pandemic? Without the test, there are no cases. Well said. We have a huge data set. Malthuss: Yes, Sweden did nothing. Denmark and Norway have also formally ended all China flu measures. Sweden is a little trickier though. They have already laid the groundwork for digital IDs — which, as I point out week after week, would appear to be the primary aim. Norway: fewer than five million inhabitants and a trillion dollars in the bank. Krona, national currency, not linked [crippled] with the Euro or anything else. On the down side — and it is a monumental downer — is the climate, which will either pep up and become warmer or will freeze them all to death if the Norwegian current [appropriately] fades away and the relatively temperate climate of Western Europe plummets.

That has been discussed recently. Then there are the Norwegians. Sweden includes several thousand mad people who volunteered, some years ago, to have a digital implant between their thumb and their forefinger, to allow them to open doors at their workplace, access the vending machines etc. Indeed I went to an LA unified school and the kids bussed in from downtown LA made fun of anyone that paid attention, did their homework or even attempted to learn.

The entire system is about wasting time. High school to eliminate teenagers from participating the work force. Same with funneling young adults into universities to get worthless degrees. Time wasting. The system is set up to put kids in holding patterns, teaching them conformity and how to follow rules. That must be allowed. Stolid, dull Asian children were seen at first to be like the brooding Native American kids. But in time test results showed they were taking it all in — unlike the so called Native Americans. Something crucial. Guess what that is. Stop blaming kids for stupid system. D from OR. Agree totally. One of the very, very few good things to come out of this mess is the confirmation of how useless our current education models are.

Why stick kids in a building 8 hours a day to be filled with often worthless knowledge and ,increasingly, with propaganda about the joys of sodomy and Wokeness? And being stuck in a room with kids the same age and background is not socialization. JTG was a prophet crying in the wilderness. However, his time may come. D, Really? Since when do the little bastards make policy? They should have no input. Those of the 19th century built the 20th. LOL, I love it. Not only concerning the quality of the educators and material taught, but also the quality and demeanor of the students. Some students should be bound for technical instruction. There is nothing wrong, no shame whatsoever in mechanical, construction, transportation degrees, etc. There is a different type of IQ here, I think.

I know people who look at a mechanical or electronic issue with more understanding than someone with an advanced physics degree. Different strokes for different folks. It takes all kinds to make things that work. Wrong learning occurs where interest is applied. The tests given then most of our college kids would fail. Most of the kids I saw that did not want to learn also smoked a lot of weed. The ghetto culture is infesting all levels of our society. Massive false consciousness as far as the eye can see. Teach kids reading, writing, and rithemetic at home.

The creation of kid herds is a cultural disaster in any case. Kids need to be with their parents and other caring adults in order to learn how to be human. Small neighborhood learning groups will give them the fundamentals. Mass public education has been disastrous. Agree completely. There is so much nonsense going on in high school it really needs to be eliminated. My crazy fantasy is the buildings get retrofitted as homeless shelters. It would be a better use. Its simply unbelievable.

Even some really small towns population wise; Liberty Hill for example have incredible stadiums…. Our tax dollars wasted!! I would agree, but that would mean the decay started a looong time ago — a statement with which I also agree. Yes, a huge amount of money spent on a tiny minority of students with some aptitude for their given sport. When most of that money would be better spent on education. Then more taxpayer money is spent pissed away subsidizing arenas for pro teams in many metro areas. I taught in an urban school district for a number of years, though at this point I have not been in a classroom for more than 15 years.

While there are a whole bunch of problems, one of the main ones is that at least half the kids are ineducable. The average IQ is too low. In an 11th grade classroom with about ten kids, only two or three of them could read. There were actually about 20 kids enrolled in the class, but they never came to class. Classroom management is difficult in such circumstances because you are trying to sit monkeys or cats or dogs in chairs for hours a day, five days a week, and force them to stare at books. They will obviously rebel. It took me about 15 years to finally process this, because we have been trained to believe that Mom did not read them bedtime stories and provide a structured environment that valued education.

The black culture does not value education because, for at least half of them, reading and arithmetic might as well be supernatural powers. To them, it just seems like foolery—just as my attention to my books and laptop are inexplicable to my pets. I thought this was a big thing in well-heeled suburbs proud of their college graduates going to the Ivies. Sublime piece as always. Quite topical. Ah the 70s. But I digress. Of course, Kurt Jurgens in the role of our ecologically-minded billionaire was pure hokum like agent XXX!! But then, one thinks: this is very close, worryingly close, to where we actually are in the world. Such is the concentration of wealth in so few hands. What for the myopic focus on inter-operability, nay homogeneity, of software platforms, for instance.

Yes, the past 2 years almost feels like a very surreal Bond movie, with a cast of villains. We are, it appears, spoiled for choice, in that regard. I think I liked the hype around them better than the actual films. Tony was a goof and Riff, a thug. But Ice…. Romanticizing covert operations. The Spy Who Came in From the Cold maybe made it less romantic — certainly not goofy like Get Smart or some of the Moore movies — but the propagandistic value was on exhibit.

In the movies the intell agency spy would save the world from the mad scientist. In real life the mad scientists have been working for the intell state all along. It will be called Dr Yes. You really hit the nail on the head, here. How can anyone NOT see what a massive psyop this is, after this stunning admission? Commie Wen seems to think the solution to that problem the final solution? They were capable of being doting parents to their own children, while at the same time totally willing to inflict atrocities on innocents. A friend I was walking with yesterday said she nearly lost it, reading a news piece about a mother who put her baby in the Pfizer baby trial, and now that 5-month-old is paralyzed from the neck down.

My prediction: Vaccine injured kids will be all the rage soon! Certainly something going on by proxy, but I think the DSM is going to have to come up with a brand new category. I see it more to be a syndrome of a broad range of afflictions and behaviors. Indeed, one of the most impressive individuals that I have ever met in my life was, in retrospect, psychopathic in the most benign and lovable ways.

It appears from here that the majority of European and American populaces are thusly afflicted. Neanderthals were not so afflicted. Saw one yesterday mom got vaxxed and the damn virus was passed in breast milk. The poor newborn got a horrible itchy rash and mom is now giving baby formula a very poor substitute. Mary, these people are lost. They are beyond help. Even their cognitive dissonance has cognitive dissonance. I watched the Wen clip today. I laughed long and hard. She tried to claim Biden made an error in saying the opposite, but she also said the opposite previously. They are taking both the divide and conquer and the Alice in Wonderland approachs simultaneously. All normal. The effect of brainwashing has been stunning. Including, I might add, among medical professionals!

MQ, the hostility and contemptuousness are so enormous, and on such a hair-trigger, that I cannot help thinking that the jabs have something in them that puts a lock on the brain. But it is one of those subjects that apparently cannot be discussed calmly and objectively. As though you are presenting a rationale for child killers. Tend to agree. Sounds delicious, GR, but I doubt it. But, what else might I have accomplished? Only a nasty backlash. If I were that wealthy, I would feel rather free.

I still do not feel cornered. Not me. Even the filthy rich need people. Several years ago, I read a post by someone who said they consulted for the rich, who were worried about the loyalty of their security forces if they had to go to their bug-out shelters in a SHTF situation. The question is whether they are correct to feel like that? I believe they are not. Unless Mr Bezos gets his rocketman act together, they will have no terrestial place to hide when the tide turns.

And it will. Or your wife is diabetic and after a few years your supply of insulin expires… and no one anywhere in your circle of contacts wants to share theirs assuming there are still facilities producing it, along with the myriad other drugs keeping folks alive these days. You want your guards to be intelligent but how intelligent? Warlordism is fun. When it all breaks down your security detail has everything to gain and nothing to lose by offing you and your kin. On their last legs. Having only a few million in the bank is a real comedown for a billionaire. The possibility of such an outcome would be a source of tremendous anxiety.

Yes, but prior to that comedown they could easily have provisioned themselves much better than I could. Why would they just wait for the financial losses??? It takes a long time to begin to hear a new narrative. Not every body fully hears the narrative we hear on this website. That further increases the anxiety, i. Talk about creepy. I made some mistakes. What is the difference between the OWG and a small pack of rich psychopaths controlling culture and formerly democratic institutions? Sounds pretty much like the same fucking thing.

Why is everyone so afraid of anything that could be labelled conspiracy? It is fucking pathetic. Oooh, not the NWO, that sounds crazy — even if they have referred to themselves as such! But a group of insanely rich psychos that control media, culture, and finance, and are unrolling a Great Reset that will result in a global New Normal well that I can get behind! But…there is a but. The world is, after all, despite the attempts to homogenise culture over the past 50 or so years, still a pretty big and culturally diverse place.

That said, primal fear probably transcends and neutralises cultural nuance. Pretty obviously, the survival of the Medical-Pharmaceutical Complex is a core agenda item. There is doubtless also a geopolitical agenda, as drugs come off patent, and Asian manufacturers probably aim to corner the market. Another core agenda item: A nascent pharma-dollar, collateralised by a manufactured, coerced market? However, regionally in, say, the US or Canada, or in Europe, or on small islands? More likely, but still not a fait-a-compli. By any stretch of the imagination. In that regard, Sweden has intrigued me for a while. Why was Sweden — considering the obvious fangs of power that were wielded elsewhere — almost, it seemed, permitted to persist with the pandemic guidelines provided for in the International Health Regulations?

No lockdowns in particular. A case control as it were. Or because they were allowed to decide on non-pharmaceutical interventions locally? Then, it got me thinking, what if another coupled agenda is — with lockdowns — to slow down societal metabolism is there a correlation between lockdown duration and severity and Debt:GDP ratio? Which will no doubt consolidate resources, it goes without saying. The mix is not reliant on oil, gas or coal to any significant extent contrast that, out of interest, with Australia — seeing an emerging pattern? Hence, with the lifting of restrictions in Fennoscandia, is it because of the meta-conditions or wider socio-economic context, meaning these societies are further along, and besides, they probably tend to be more harmonious and acquiescent.

Here is a quote from Dr Simon Michaux. This was We were confined to 5km, then 2km, from home. Not too big a deal living where I do, rural but resilient and resourceful. Knowing skilled neighbours is worth more than money can buy. Walkable distances. Stories about my grandfather came to mind. A little taster of the privations those people in the early 20th century had to endure. In that sense, is energy the key fulcrum for all this madness? Many have posited that covid19 will disappear largely when climate change lockdowns start, so I think you are definitely over the mark. They are being assimilated, so why rile them up?

Then they will seal it off with the electronic currency, which they are now saying needs to go ahead. You tried to bully people like me in submission. You threatened us with dining out, then our jobs, then visiting relatives in other states. Great point. Uh oh, you said the B word, Liz. Come on people. You are both smart and valued members of the site. Perfect, Liz. The time for old world niceties are over. I received a demand today from our lovely government here in Europe to fulfil a survey about attitudes towards the jab.

The foreign lands are the Philippines. I worked with a number of them at my last job and with the exception of one, they were not very good nurses. Cheerful, nice people but poorly educated. I came to work one morning and a patient had died overnight. He had classic symptoms of a heart attack but the Phillipino nurse though he was constipated. She told all of us his symptoms in morning report. India is another resource for cheap medical staff. Temporary licenses are issued and Bingo! There is ZERO shortage of American women who want those jobs, but Americans have come to expect pay commensurate with the work they do. I went to the article you linked and there it was!

Welcome to America! The hospital administrators have completely taken over from the medical team — even doctors are under their thumb and are being replaced by nurse practitioners as much as possible. That would be right MQ. Filipino and Sri Lankan nurses here. Gotta feel for these people, merely pawns on the chessboard. They do. But corporates see this as a cost. In my experience, this attitude has pervaded healthcare but also another key sector: seafaring. Perhaps a component of a broader issue: logistics and supply chain. Case in point, albeit somewhat OT: the shortage of specialist tanker drivers in the UK. This is having unforseen effects:. Just a thought: since so much of what passes for credible information nowadays emanates from centralised news bureaus and sources, how easy would it be to whip up a fuss by amplifying perceived threats, including those in the links above…..

The ones I worked with were nice but only one out of all of them was smart and conscientious and they stuck together. I agree SW, but for another reason….. Can you imagine? Has anyone addressed this? It scares the hell out of me, more than Covid The clot shot by another means. No thanks!! The commissary is where people can by groceries for fasr cheaper than out in town most of the time at least. Every so often they would have really good specials on items and one of them was live Maine lobsters.

I watched an older white lady ask for two of them and the Filipina said they had been sold and were on hold which of course was not true. Next Filipino walked up and asked for one and it was provided. My daughter worked for the Navy exchange and got a serious dose of the Filipino mafia sticking together and being nasty. She worked hard went the extra mile and was rewarded with a management track.

While ladies that had worked there for decades did the minimum took no extra responsibilities on and sniped at her for everything she did and for getting rewarded for doing so. It got so bad she actually had to lodge a complaint and the only other non Filipino lady backed up her claim they were ganging up on her and lying. I worked with Filipina nurses and at one particular hospital they finally got written up for refusing to speak English around other nurses or when they were in patients rooms. The problem is none of this and all of this and so much more. I think the mind virus idea is the one most definitely at work. The mind virus aspect is by the far the most dangerous. That said, the psychosomatic aspect of illness has long been recognized but equally underappreciated.

I am 71 and living in the heart of Los Angeles with two little ones who brought home every nasty head cold they could catch since the Fall of I only wore a mask when I absolutely had to, started the FLCCC prevention protocols as soon as I was aware of them and knock on wood everybody knock on wood! Survived all the colds the monkeys brought home. Yesterday I talked to my jabbed up woke sister in Washington and she became very upset that I am still refusing the jabs.

I must have one hell of an immune system! And regardless of what happens to me, I will always be indebted to how well it has served me! They had to believe in the spell the witch doctor placed on them. Look how many educated people fell for a rag over your airways to prevent this special special super duper virus like no other we ever saw before from spreading. Yes indeed. As the religious people know full well, belief is a powerful thing.

Very hard to break that spell as well. I usually try to avoid espousing my beliefs, or lack thereof. I lean toward Deism. You cannot have a rational discussion with irrational people. Diet, exercise, supplements, fresh air are well and necessary. But a belief in your own ability to thrive is even more important. Is it even important at this point whether some mild coronavirus escaped from a lab or not? I still think they just rebranded the naturally occurring one. What he did was shameful and if not outright treason, skated really close to the line. It has not been proven to exist, and the test used to determine illness is an utter fraud. Night Owl, I am starting to come around to seeing that.

Sure sounds like man made, gain of function stuff to me. I made this comment on Twitter. I see where Denmark has just declared victory over The Rona. Now it will be treated as just another bad flu bug. Imagine the Rona happened a mere 20 years ago. Think of all the healthy humans who caught it and had a bad two weeks feeling punk and some maybe sneezed a few times and had a bit of a sore throat and bounced back and never even knew they had the Rona. Early viral treatment even for head colds and flu! Ask your doctor! Regardless of all the machinations imaginable, an industrial financial system based on exponential growth has but a single conceivable end point.

Take an ant colony and pour out a bakery sized 50lb bag of sugar. What happens? If its any solace, the power top is also in the same boat. But at the end of the day, they too will be are also in thunderdome. Think electrical and crude with nearby food production [workforce included]. I know anecdotes are problematic, but here we go. I knew of a moderate number of people who got it and a few deaths, all of whom had co-morbidities. My wife, my daughter to name a few. Fully vaxxed.

Another story — mother, son and husband — all vaxxed. The son lives in a house with 5 other guys — 4 of the 6 vaxxed. What the hell is going on? Their is no reason to intellectualize on and on about this supposed virus! The response is a hoax…The Doctors, the administrators and virologists etc of this Country are a shame for not fighting this fraud! I saw a guy comment on a YouTube thing about the psychological phenomenon going on where people seem hypnotized. The ones that are culted are just going to double down on their beliefs the more carnage they see. MQ, as I mentioned somewhere else in this thread, the conviction seems so strong and so rigid that it is as though the mRNA itself has locked onto the brains of those succumbing to it. How else to explain this?

That is an excessive fine — unconstitutional! The Vietnam War: Who won? They did. They kept their country. In war, you only have to win one battle — the last one. The US stupidity is that we think that our Republican form of society is a one size fits all for the world. Our country is not easy, it is advanced citizenship. That fits in very few places. We go into a civil war situation and take a side. Then we try to have an election, something the population of most places do not even understand.

Then we fight the other side for multiple years. One characteristic is wars go on forever as the one side never gives up trying to get us out. Why were we surprised the Taliban took over so quickly? Ten years in Viet Nam and guys killed. When are we as a nation going to say no? Our last great victory, WW2, produced millions of casualties for America. Afghanistan, killed over 20 years for payback of killed in WTC. Leaving Afghanistan was a way to funnel billions of dollars worth of military equipment to the Chinese.

Pretty transparent, too. They tried everything they could to keep ISIS raping and looting. They failed the first time, as Vlad stopped them. The judicial system is a gross corruption. You rely upon it at your peril. I remember President George W. I was hoping he and Hunter could open an art gallery together. They have so much in common. They could compare notes on rehab, being the sons of powerful men and how Dad got them jobs doing nothing but they got paid anyhow. The Wokenati is trying to install their version of tyranny all right but they are totally undisciplined, pampered and incompetent morons. A lot of them with mental issues.

Entropy is winning this race. The very institutions needed for a tyrannical rule or any other rule are crumbling inside ever faster. The job they got in the first place because they had the right skin color or sexual minority status or just zealots from Antifa or some other similar organization. Conflicting insane orders and directives, backstabbing, different fractions fighting for power, competent workers quitting in droves and this woke ideology being pushed above all else. It must be a madhouse run by the inmates themselves! Yes, all this is part of the Plan. Use the vermin to destroy the Nation.

Your confusion? Exactly as planned. The vermin do not have the money or power to destroy the country. They have the vote, period. Their vote has become worthless due to PTB manipulation with power and money. The globalists cannot take power until the patriotic US is gone. Funny how Australia made their people surrender their guns and now the fascist police are in the streets shooting their citizens with rubber bullets. Someone edited in the videos of the Victoria police directly attacking, beating, choking and throwing women on the pavement during the past year over lockdowns and masks. May as well put trained killers into hospitals to do the job faster.

The unjabbed personnel were getting big mouths. Hearing lots of anecdotal stories about rehiring folks back but avoiding that cohort if possible. Good overview. I also wonder how the same people trying to win the Oppression Olympics and paying rent using GoFundMe pity accounts are going to run the world. And yes, many if not most of them are off their rockers. They spend all their time on TikTok scolding society for hurting their feelz. As a group their debts exceed their wealth. Just one of those unplanned, bad luck things? If you took all the money of a society and distributed it evenly across society and waited ten years, it would look just the same as when you started.

The enemy of the PTB is the education of the folks. That is why the Liberal drive of the past fifty years has emphasized the Stupidification of the American people. We live in the kingdom of the grifters. The grifters club on top gets to make the rules and distribute the wealth. The street level grifters hustle for spare change in front of a steam roller. They are not brilliant so much as corrupt. And the rules we all have to play by — except them, of course. In when everything crashed a friend of mine son was in a hedge fund that was bailed out pennies on the dollar by AIG. The exact same AIG that WE bailed out so while he raked in the loot, people were thrown on the street. The grifters have taken over the system and feel no qualms of guilt.

Gaslighting has played an important role keeping this going. No anger for the deadbeat bankers. Class War — the original Forever War. Do We, the People have the requisite heat to defeat? First we had a theory that the economic elite want to greatly reduce the global population for the good of the planet. Next, we witness the development of the Covid bioweapon and the quick production of a toxic vaccine to neatly finish the job. Brilliant analyst Clive Maund brings it all together here.

David Copperfield has got nothing on Amazing Joe Biden. You know bad optics and all. For there will be another one. Muahahaha, indeed there will be another one, right on the heels of the election. The year is going to be a doozy, if we as a nation can all make it that far. Hell Yes! There will be another pandemic. The first was a dress rehearsal to shake out the bugs no pun intended in their system.

Ishibaka wonders how can the Covid pandemic be part of a serious depopulation agenda considering how few people were actually killed including by vaccine to date. Which is a good question. The Powers That Be are not a one trick pony. They have many devices at their disposal including deadlier pandemics. There are wars nuclear and conventional. China has been severely hit by flooding for 2 years in a row.

They need to import a lot of food, yet bad weather has now hit many food exporting regions around the world. Mayors, city councils, and the police have forgotten how to do their jobs and make cities livable, surrendering the streets to rioters, looters, drug addicts, gang shooters, etc. Then there are the world-wide supply chain breakdowns. Suddenly, everyone is too incompetent to deliver the goods or unload ships. Nobody can find a truck driver to work.

Look at the UK, running out of gasoline and food in stores. Europe as well. We in the USA have only begun to see such problems. What treats do TPTB have planned for the long, cold winter? JHK has caught on. It sure looks like somebody is deliberately trying to destroy our civilization. For those questioning that the vax is the bioweapon hypothesis, yes, it sounds way-out, but we are in way-into way-out times. Stop buying up all of the masks, folks. Yeah, that sounds good…! The worst kind of science is the kind used to legitimate government policy. Absolute rot. April fool! Not surprised. The current thinking is that the booster is a kill shot they are trying to time to flu season with the idea that they can blame all the deaths on the unjabbed and unboosted.

Bring it on! As if this pampered sonofabitch would take an inoculation in a tent set up next to where they were holding the tractor pull event. Same tent? Or next to the tractors? Or over in the pig tent? See the article I linked below: thousands of excess deaths for no reason we can possibly imagine are now occurring in Britain. A name in bold above Gibberish Gibberish Hackneyed stab at the profound Redundant signature line Lest you forget.

I am continually amazed by unprovoked emotional fits of rage, inarticulate and self-loathing, lashing out blindly with obvious intent to destroy. They are such a stark contrast to reason and critical thinking, a complete abdication of philosophical inquiry and purity. All of our stories are but illusions with no cognitive power to know. My stories are no less abstract or silly than yours. Write something cute or new or tricky or witty with a little flare or panache. The mundane is boring.

Inspire me. Remember: calm breaths, tranquil thoughts, let the ego fade. The information is now out there, that there was evidence of successful treatment of COVID back in , using commonly available and even OTC medications. Early start of treatment, regardless of the severity of patient symptoms. Patients with mild or recent-onset symptoms cough, fever, general malaise, anosmia, polymyalgia : — Azithromycin mg orally every 24 h for 3 days if there is rapid improvement, and for 6 days if the duration of symptoms is prolonged. Patients with previous lung disease asthma or COPD used their usual bronchodilators. Prophylactic treatment for close contacts, including all asymptomatic residents: — Antihistamines at the same dose as symptomatic patients.

It looks to me like articles such as the one from Yahoo I posted above, are attempting to cover up what the Market Ticker guy and others have uncovered. It also looks to me like if you could get yourself some early treatment for yourself except for the antibiotics, your doctor would have to get you those , no one would need the pill the pharmaceutical companies are working on, to keep the money train running when it is finally proven that their shots are worse than good for nothing. If we can go get ourselves some Claritin at the supermarket, who will bother with an expensive prescription pill?

I got news for them! A group of my friends and I share info on ivermectin via email. They gonna start trying to censor that, too? Good luck, esp. I saw they had their sights on Telegram, well, Germany anyway. Germany also is threatening to censor Gab. If one finds themself surrounded by a large contingent of dim, course, shallow, needy, and easily manipulated people, why would one feel bad about treating them poorly? The some who know what it means. Taking me back to my previous point. Their bank balance? That would eliminate most artists, doctors and nurses, engineers, pilots, philosophers, musicians, teachers even the good ones , scientists and the few people left who actually know how to farm and ranch.

For anyone lacking in the genetic predisposition towards empathy, the answer is probably obvious. Gift and effort. As Krishna says, the Four Castes are not an artificial imposition, but rather they are made by Me. The Brahmins, the Priests and Intellectuals, are the head. And I thought, is that a feminist message? The shirt was a child size. Asians voted for Obama in greater proportion than did the Hispanics. They want to be on the winning side. They chose correctly. There are three things we can always count on. Obscene-selfishness-beyond-belief is one hell of a way to run a Planet. And we are seeing the despicable results of this kind of sick default social system these days on a daily basis. Like unto like! Robins with robins.

Bears with bears. This is the Law of Life. To other peoples? If Karen is Yoho in drag think Norman Bates ; the anima released is not nurturing but more like Kali, destroyer of worlds. On , I was walking over a bridge on my way to the cathedral and saw a small cloud formation ahead in a perfectly blue sky, it was shiva, doing a jig. Only when the two forces are delicately balanced do we have fissionable material.

Small part? So foolish. Everything is trying to kill you, and you will never get out alive. The planet will be consumed by the sun. The universe will die from heat death entropy. Then a big crunch Then another bang. Watching an episode of Israel today recently, notice the moving blue or red lines that now frame all the anchors! But you see those moving colours, you turn that channel, just more trance bs. Wondering why people seem hypnotized? Well, the automatic earth article identified a drug in the vax that calmed rats in other experiments.

Also note that your subconscious cannot process a negative. Because they always tell us first. There are a million ways to manipulate people, be careful. It has been shown to reduce the anxiety of laboratory mice when injected into their brains. Graphene is also highly conductive and, in some circumstances, paramagnetic. With a pillow, until they stop moving. Stay awake and speak out.

Courage is contagious. Causa discordiae, vade! If mankind were at peace with itself, there would be peace in the world. Man will only have peace if he has in his heart true love of neighbor that springs from a whole-hearted love for my Son. She practiced obedience to the point of heroism. Pride, everything revolts it, everything distresses it. It has anguish in this world and in the next. At one point Jesus showed Maryam the netherworld. Because the indifference of this world is so great, that you have not realized that it has been Me Who has knocked on the door of many nations, seeking refuge, relief, shelter and food to survive.

God is in a sense humility itself. Creation is the act of giving ones life away. He loves them because they are Him in microcosm. You could say that to stoop to BE in microcosm is the essence of humility. I would extrapolate from that, that Satan was likewise indignant that God stooped to become trees, rocks, jellyfish, dogs and cats, earthworms, porpoises, mountains, oceans, and whatnot. Hence it is a preference for non-being, nonentity, and death, presumably out of pride. Be it done unto me according to thy word. Our truest—and indeed our ONLY—self is the divine self.

One can escape this only through nonentity. I will choose being and creation. I will be God the giver-awayer of life and being. I will humbly be a mere man or woman. Yes Anthea, it reminds me of the Jewish midrash tale where God blows himself up into infinitesimal bits in order to come to know Himself. So we are points of light, our tiny flames burn bright for a season and flicker to return to the ocean of Love that is God. Ocean of light might have been more apt. If all is holy then please send someone to make order where there is chaos in both my computer cords and cupboards.

That includes tangled computer cords, the oven that needs cleaning, and so forth. Our attitude towards all things, convenient or inconvenient, should be reverent. This physical existence is a very high privilege. This is probably your job. You could be a bit of a magnifying glass for the graces shed upon yourself. It is my understanding Anthea, that lucifer was outraged that God chose a mere human to both incarnate as and gestate within. So his pride, outrage at the choice of Mary to be mother of God caused his expulsion from heaven. He gave him the physical world to mess with, and the underworld to control. Or he knocks down the mighty to save them too. We have infinite power over these megalomaniacal fucks, because we have nothing to lose but our lives in this war, they have the whole world to lose.

And, since everything works to Gods advantage …in the end, these mofos ape God in killing and controlling us. Mirror will be broken, cipher will not work Cup goes to the dump, chafe can only burn Bones they turn to dust, though it may take eons. No, you are God Himself manifesting in the microcosm. You are God because you exist only because he gave himself to become you. You are humble because it is the nature of God to have this humility of giving himself away to the creature—and IMHO to every object in the creation. But this is also sublimity. I am not sure pride is exactly the right word. This was mostly not taken into account in the statistics.

The most vulnerable groups can be clearly identified. The vast majority of deceased patients were 80 years of age or older. Meanwhile, there is an affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ hydroxychloroquine , zinc and AZT azithromycin. Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now. This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results.

This contrasts sharply with the theoretical criticism insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies which in some countries e. The primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3 authors were in conflict of interest. However, most of the guidelines based on this study remained unchanged … 48 Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc, called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy. The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.

From the distressing media images of ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome where people were suffocating and given artificial respiration in agony, we now know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the pulmonary blood vessels. The administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation, which was found to cause additional damage to lung tissue, means that this dreaded complication, too, is virtually not fatal anymore. Spreading occurs by drip infection only for patients who cough or sneeze and aerosols in closed, unventilated rooms.

Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air. Contact tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people or positively tested asymptomatic carriers are virtually unable to transmit the virus. Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk. Transfer via objects e. All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people — there is no scientific basis for this. They reduce the risk of droplet infection by sneezing or coughing. Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections.

Wearing a mask is not without side effects. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of an increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.

Our Labour Code Codex 6 refers to a CO2 content ventilation in workplaces of ppm, maximum ppm in special circumstances. After wearing a mask for one minute, this toxic limit is considerably exceeded to values that are three to four times higher than these maximum values. Anyone who wears a mask is therefore in an extreme poorly ventilated room. Inappropriate use of masks without a comprehensive medical cardio-pulmonary test file is therefore not recommended by recognised safety specialists for workers. A second wave is now being discussed in Belgium, with a further tightening of the measures as a result.

The number of hospital admissions or deaths showed a shortlasting minimal increase in recent weeks, but in interpreting it, we must take into account the recent heatwave. This indicates that the proportion of the measures taken in relation to the working population and young people is disproportionate to the intended objectives. The corona measures form a striking contrast to the minimal policy pursued by the government until now, when it comes to well-founded measures with proven health benefits such as the sugar tax, the ban on e- cigarettes and making healthy food, exercise and social support networks financially attractive and widely accessible.

It is a missed opportunity for a better prevention policy that could have brought about a change in mentality in all sections of the population with clear results in terms of public health. Vaccinating our elderly appears to be inefficient. Over 75 years of age, the efficacy is almost non-existent. Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time afterwards.

An untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions. On a global scale, cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine. Over the past few months, newspaper, radio and TV makers seemed to stand almost uncritically behind the panel of experts and the government, there, where it is precisely the press that should be critical and prevent one-sided governmental communication. This has led to a public communication in our news media, that was more like propaganda than objective reporting. In our opinion, it is the task of journalism to bring news as objectively and neutrally as possible, aimed at finding the truth and critically controlling power, with dissenting experts also being given a forum in which to express themselves.

The official story that a lockdown was necessary, that this was the only possible solution, and that everyone stood behind this lockdown, made it difficult for people with a different view, as well as experts, to express a different opinion. Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed. We have not seen open debates in the media, where different views could be expressed. We were also surprised by the many videos and articles by many scientific experts and authorities, which were and are still being removed from social media. We feel that this does not fit in with a free, democratic constitutional state, all the more so as it leads to tunnel vision. This policy also has a paralysing effect and feeds fear and concern in society.

In this context, we reject the intention of censorship of dissidents in the European Union! The way in which Covid has been portrayed by politicians and the media has not done the situation any good either. War terms were popular and warlike language was not lacking. The relentless bombardment with figures, that were unleashed on the population day after day, hour after hour, without interpreting those figures, without comparing them to flu deaths in other years, without comparing them to deaths from other causes, has induced a real psychosis of fear in the population.

This is not information, this is manipulation. We deplore the role of the WHO in this, which has called for the infodemic i. The general principle of good governance calls for the proportionality of government decisions to be weighed up in the light of the Higher Legal Standards: any interference by government must comply with the fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention on Human Rights ECHR. Interference by public authorities is only permitted in crisis situations. In other words, discretionary decisions must be proportionate to an absolute necessity. The measures currently taken concern interference in the exercise of, among other things, the right to respect of private and family life, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and association, the right to education, etc.

For example, in accordance with Article 8 2 of the ECHR, interference with the right to private and family life is permissible only if the measures are necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, the economic well-being of the country, the protection of public order and the prevention of criminal offences, the protection of health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the regulatory text on which the interference is based must be sufficiently clear, foreseeable and proportionate to the objectives pursued. The predicted pandemic of millions of deaths seemed to respond to these crisis conditions, leading to the establishment of an emergency government.

Now that the objective facts show something completely different, the condition of inability to act otherwise no time to evaluate thoroughly if there is an emergency is no longer in place. Covid is not a cold virus, but a well treatable condition with a mortality rate comparable to the seasonal flu. In other words, there is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to public health. An open discussion on corona measures means that, in addition to the years of life gained by corona patients, we must also take into account other factors affecting the health of the entire population. These include damage in the psychosocial domain increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse 16 and economic damage.

If we take this collateral damage into account, the current policy is out of all proportion, the proverbial use of a sledgehammer to crack a nut. We find it shocking that the government is invoking health as a reason for the emergency law. As doctors and health professionals, in the face of a virus which, in terms of its harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility, approaches the seasonal influenza, we can only reject these extremely disproportionate measures.

This is unacceptable for a democratic state governed by the rule of law. We would like to make a public appeal to our professional associations and fellow carers to give their opinion on the current measures. We draw attention to and call for an open discussion in which carers can and dare to speak out. With this open letter, we send out the signal that progress on the same footing does more harm than good, and call on politicians to inform themselves independently and critically about the available evidence — including that from experts with different views, as long as it is based on sound science — when rolling out a policy, with the aim of promoting optimum health.

The immunology of the allergy epidemic and the hygiene hypothesis. Nat Immunol 18, — In the last few weeks in various podcasts and interviews people have been trying their best to get me to say that the entire COVID panic is a conspiracy. I understand what they are trying to do, but I was not born yesterday! The moment you say, or even imply, something is a conspiracy you step on a landmine that blows you, and your reputation, to smithereens. Because you immediately become a conspiracy theorist. For those who have never heard of him, look him up. According to Wikipedia:. Now, he may not believe that anymore, maybe he never did.

Maybe it was a joke, and his words got twisted. But he has managed to gather the kind of reputation that tends to make people suspect he may not be entirely tightly sane. A shadowy Dr. No sitting in an underground layer, stroking a spoiled, fluffy white cat, and cackling. I would just say to Dr. Now their work here is done. They will soon be heading back to their home-world of Kardashia to plot the destruction of entire inter-galactic civilisations using their inanitron device, powered entirely by trivium crystals.

However, I do not believe in worldwide conspiracies… humans are too incompetent to get a proper worldwide conspiracy organised for one thing. However I do believe in Foxy-Loxy. They then run into Foxy-Loxy:. Help us! He led them straight to his den, and they never saw the king, or anyone else, ever again …. In other versions of the story, Foxy-Loxy deliberately throws the acorn that hits Chicken Little on the head, in order to start the panic in the first place. He then waits to take advantage of the ensuing events. In other words, there is no worldwide cabal, no great shadowy conspiracy.

Instead what we have is — what I call — a conspiracy of the willing. When fear strikes, the vast bulk of the public really, really, want to be protected, and will do almost anything to feel safe. The medical profession wishes to protect people and will do almost anything they are told, to help their patients. Politicians very much wish to be seen as great statesmen, protecting the public and bringing in laws to do so.

Standing at podiums looking terribly serious and important and pretending to be Winston Churchill. There is no conspiracy here, but there is a massive drive for them all to rush to the king for protection. At which point, Foxy Loxy has them all perfectly under control. A little nudge here, a little nudge there, and the entire mob will head off in whatever direction you wish. A shepherd with two perfectly controlled sheepdogs. The dread sheepdogs of fear and empty promises.

In the flu pandemic at the end of World War One, the average age of death was twenty-eight 1. Which is older than the average life expectancy in parts of the UK. In Italy, in the early stages of the pandemic, the CFR for those under twenty-nine was zero per cent. Rising to twenty per cent in those over eighty 3. It always falls as more and more people are tested. I am not getting into an unwinnable argument as to the value of human life at different ages. I am simply making the point that COVID19 is, for reasons not well established, vastly more serious in the elderly population. This is very different from previous epidemics. COVID19 also targets those with significant underlying medical conditions.

In essence, we know that COVID19 is a disease that is both significant and deadly in the elderly population. Particularly the elderly population with underlying medical conditions. The risk appears to be lower than for influenza. In children, and those under forty, the risk is almost non-existent. Therefore, it is relatively straightforward to identify pretty accurately those who we need to help protect from COVID19, and those who we do not.

On this basis I am going to recommend that the best way to protect the vulnerable elderly is to build up immunity in the younger population, in order to stop the spread throughout the whole community. If eighty per cent of the population under seventy were to get infected, this would stop transmission in its tracks, and COVID19 would be gone. However, what we are doing currently is to lockdown ever more tightly to stop the spread. Whether or not this is working is unclear. However, let us assume that it is doing so. Then, I would argue that we are doing precisely the wrong thing at precisely the wrong time.

It is true that in recent weeks, positive infection tests have risen rapidly. However, deaths have not nor have hospital admissions. In the month of August which is as far as the Office for National Statistics figures go , in the under thirty age group, there was one death 5. Of course, if more and more people get infected, and more elderly vulnerable people get infected, there will eventually be an increase in deaths. Therefore, what we need to do right now — before winter comes — is to encourage everyone who is fit and well and under the age of seventy slightly arbitrary figure to take the masks off, get together and spread this virus far and wide.

How long would it take to infect the rest of the population? Using widely accepted figures. If the R number is three average number of people an infected person will go on to infect , and the serial interval is four days time from becoming infected to infecting others 6 , then we can do a little thought experiment. We start with the number of people currently infected. Today, Sept 11th there were 3, positive tests in the UK. This assumes we have detected every single infected person in the UK, which is not possible, so my 24, figure is a major underestimate of the true starting point. If the R number is three, and the serial interval is four, we would treble the number of cases every four days. We start on day one with 24, infective people.

Done in a month. As more and more people get infected, there are less people left to infect so the R number drops. We also know that a number of people have already been infected. How many? Who knows. However, the general principle stands. We could protect the vulnerable elderly by creating sufficient immunity in the rest of the population, ensuring that the elderly are shielded at the same time, and it could be done rapidly. Matt Hancock UK health secretary, for those reading this blog in other countries , made the utterly insensitive comment urging people not to kill their granny:. Has this man been on a course on how to really and truly insult and upset your electorate?

If not, then he is clearly just a natural. Because grandpas are people too. Yes, I know, some people, many people… most people? Will be upset by what I have written. How can you possibly encourage people to go out and get infected? Do you want people to die? No, I want the least possible number of people to die of this awful disease, and its terrible consequences. I also want to stop lockdown as soon as possible because I know that lockdown kills people. Forgetting the economy, forgetting the social destruction and loss of jobs and livelihoods, there are terrible things happening to lives. The UK has followed the global pattern of rising domestic abuse risks during the crisis: calls and contacts to helplines have increased markedly and evidence suggests incidents are becoming more complex and serious, with higher levels of physical violence and coercive control.

Counting Dead Women has calculated that there were at least sixteen domestic abuse killings of women and children between 23 March and 12 April. Young children are far more likely to die at the hands of their parents than they are to die of COVID19, and young women are far more likely to die at the hands of their abusive partners. Vulnerable children are far safer at school than at home. Yet, we are locking them in their houses. So, I would turn the whole argument around. Why are we killing children with Lockdown? Get rid of the virus, now, get rid of lockdown now, and allow them to live. Allow the rest of us to have a job, and a future. As for our elderly people, trapped in houses and Care Homes, unable to see their families.

Get rid of this virus now, get rid of lockdown now, and allow them to live. To those who believe they occupy the moral high ground by demanding more lockdowns, more protection etc. I believe that you are failing to protect anyone. The fact is that we know who to protect, and the best way to do it is to create population-wide immunity as fast as possible. In doing so, we will not overwhelm the hospitals. We will not destroy the NHS — or any other health service around the world. So long as this disease does not rampage through the elderly population again. For those who say, we must wait for a vaccine.

I would say that you could be right to do so, one may appear. However, if you are not right, if problems emerge in development or rollout, what do we do. Lockdown forever? Keep the elderly apart from the rest of society, forever? We can only plan on the basis of what we know, what we have got right now. What we have got is a virus that is, for the vast majority of the population is, relatively benign. The majority of people who test positive are not even aware they have been infected. That is very difficult to say. John Ioannidis, a professor and researcher that I rate very highly, attempted to calculate the Infection Fatality Rate in the under seventy population. In July he put it at 0. So, I will go with his figure 9. Which may not sound a lot to some.

However, in the UK, we have sixty-seven million people, of whom fifty-six million are under age seventy. So, four in ten thousand fatalities would result in twenty-two thousand four hundred deaths. I agree that is a lot, but this figure comes in far too high, for a number of reasons. So, we can immediately reduce twenty-two thousand four hundred to eighteen thousand. Still too many? Well we would, of course, shield people with underlying diseases such as type II diabetes and cancer and heart disease.

So, if we also protect those under seventy, who have serious underlying condition, the eighteen thousand figure reduces to one thousand and eighty. Which means that it may be possible to achieve population wide immunity at a maximum cost of just over one thousand deaths, from COVID19, Probably not even that, as we do now know far better how to treat it than we did at the start. We could also do this by the end of the year — by the latest. You still think one thousand deaths is too many. Well, consider the alternative. Let us look at just one condition, cancer. Due to the actions taken to reduce deaths from COVID19, there has been a serious delay in cancer diagnosis.

Here from the Lancet:. Urgent policy interventions are necessary, particularly the need to manage the backlog within routine diagnostic services to mitigate the expected impact of the COVID pandemic on patients with cancer. The authors estimated the years of life lost from delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment will be in the region of 59, — 63, However, sixty thousand years of life lost is significantly greater than one thousand COVID19 deaths, and the longer we go on, the greater this number becomes. This, remember, is just one condition. The ONS estimated that lockdown has, so far, caused sixteen thousand excess deaths due to such things as people not attending hospital with heart attacks and strokes, and suchlike. I want to emphasize this is not my figure, it comes from SAGE Lockdown itself, kills people, in their thousands and thousands.

Their tens of thousands. Some people think so, including me. I say this because ONS further estimated that, in England alone, the economic recession itself will lead to around 17, excess deaths per year, for several years. Add that to the sixteen thousand this year, add that to the cancer lives lost…. This is between 6, and 38, additional deaths per year, with a central estimate of 17, per year The other point to bear in mind is that, if we shield the elderly and vulnerable, and create population immunity, we are also protecting millions of people who would have a far greater risk of dying if they became infected.

Using an infection fatality rate of one per cent in the over seventies [it is probably higher than that] we have twelve million people over seventy in the UK. If eighty per cent got infected, this could result in nine hundred and sixty thousand deaths. That would certainly overwhelm the health service. Will this get rid of it forever — who knows — it may return in the winter. If not this winter, next winter? If we open up society there will be a cost, there will be deaths, that is inarguable. However, I believe that we will save far more lives by letting this disease spread in the younger, healthy population.

We will save both children and adults, and we can return to normal life. Therefore, the proposal is simple. Work out who is most at risk, work out how to keep them shielded, then encourage everyone else to get out there and live their lives as before. Once we have the infection rates sufficiently high to block viral spread, the entire population, including the elderly and vulnerable, can be released to live their lives as before. The alternative is to wait, in hope, for a vaccine. One that is almost certainly not going to get here before winter arrives in the Northern Hemisphere. By which time further irreparable harm will have been done, and thousands more lives will have been lost, unnecessarily. In some ways this is not surprising.

Medical terminology is horribly imprecise, and often poorly understood. In calmer times such things are only of interest to research geeks like me. However, right now, it really, really, matters. Every day we are informed of a worrying rise in COVID cases in country after country, region after region, city after city. Portugal, France, Leicester, Bolton. Panic, lockdown, quarantine. In France the number of reported cases is now as high as it was at the peak of the epidemic. Over 5,, on the first of September. But what does this actually mean? Just to keep the focus on France for a moment.

Fourteen days later, there were 1, deaths. In stark contrast, on August 16 th , there were 3, cases. Fourteen days later there were 26 deaths. In August 0. This seems extremely unlikely. In fact, it is so unlikely that it is, in fact, complete rubbish. What we have is a combination of nonsense figures which, added together, create nonsense squared. Or nonsense to the power ten.

Here, from Wikipedia…. Sigh, thud! A symptomless, or even mildly symptomatic positive swab is not a case. Never, in recorded history, has this been true. However, now we have an almost unquestioned acceptance that a positive swab represents a case of COVID. This is then parroted on all the news channels as if it were gospel. I note that, at last, some people are beginning to question how it can be that, whilst cases are going up and up, deaths are going down, and down. This is even the case in Sweden, which seems to be the final bastion of people with functioning brains. However, even they seem surprised by this dichotomy. In the first two weeks of August they had 4, positive swabs.

Yet, in the last two weeks of August, they had a mere 14 deaths one a day, on average. Which, currently, represent a case fatality rate of 0. Just to compare that with something similar, the case fatality rate of swine flu HIN1 , was 0. On the other hand, if you look at the figures from around the world, they are very different. As I write this there have been, according to the WHO, 25 million cases and , deaths. Ten times as high. Why are these figures so all over the place? It is because we are using horribly inaccurate terminology. We are comparing apples with pomegranates to tell us how many bananas we have.

Our experts are, essentially, talking gibberish, and the mainstream media is lapping it up. They are defining asymptomatic swabs as cases, and no-one is calling them out on it. Because… because they are frightened of looking stupid? Primarily, I believe, because they also have no idea what a case might actually be So, it all sounds quite reasonable to them. However, moving on from that nonsense, there is some extremely good news buried in here. Which I am going to try and explain. It goes as follows. At the start of the epidemic, the only people being tested were those who were being admitted to hospital, who were seriously ill. Many of them died. This fall has occurred, and will occur everywhere in the World, because as you increase your testing, you pick up more and more people with less severe symptoms.

People who are far less likely to die. The more you test, the more the case fatality rate falls. It falls even more dramatically when you start to test people who have no symptoms at all. In fact, as you broaden your testing net, something else very important happens. You gradually move from looking at the case fatality rate to the infection fatality rate. The infection fatality rate is the measure of how many people who are infected [even those without symptoms, or very mild symptoms] who then die. This is the critical figure to know because it gives you an accurate assessment of the total number of deaths you are likely to see.

So, where have we got to. If we look at the more recent figures things have changed very dramatically. In the first two weeks of August there were 13, positive swabs in the UK. In the second two weeks of August there were deaths. If you consider every positive swab to be a case, this represents a case fatality rate of 0. Around one fifteenth of that seen at the start. It is falling, falling, everywhere. Remember, we are still only testing a fraction of the population, so we are missing the majority of people who have been infected, mainly those who do not have symptoms. Which means that these rates must fall further, as they always do in any pandemic. The best place to estimate where we may finally end up with COVID, is with the country that has tested the most people, per head of population.

This is Iceland. To quote the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine once more:. Sitting in the middle of 0. As you can see, Iceland, having tested more people than anywhere else, has the lowest IFR of all. This is not a coincidence. This is an inevitable result of testing more people. I am going to make a prediction that, in the end, we will end up with an IFR of somewhere around 0. Which is about the same as severe flu pandemics we have had in the past. Remember that figure. It is one in a thousand. It may surprise you to know that I am not the only person to have made this exact same prediction. In another article in the Journal, Guan et al. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.

Their words, not mine. At this point, you may well be asking. Right from the start by the most influential infectious disease organisations in the World. It is because of the mad mathematical modellers. The academic epidemiologists. Neil Ferguson, and others of his ilk. When they were guessing sorry estimating, sorry modelling the impact of COVID they used a figure of approximately one per cent as the infection fatality rate. Not the case fatality rate. Actually, Imperial College reduced it slightly to 0. So, we would see around 50, deaths, about the same as was seen in previous bad flu pandemics. What Imperial College London did was to use a model that overestimated the infection fatality rate by a factor of ten.

The UK, for example, has seen 42, deaths so far, which is 0. The US has seen about , deaths 0. Sweden, which did not lockdown down, has seen about 6, deaths, which is an infection fatality rate of 0. All three countries are opening up and opening up. They are, to all intents and purposes, flatlining. Whilst everyone is panicking about the ever-increasing number of cases, we should be celebrating them.

The Infection Fatality Rate is most likely going to end up around 0. Wise words, wise words indeed. Words that were written by one Anthony S Fauci on the 28 th of February The mortality rate Dr Fauci? Could it possibly be that he failed to understand that there is no such thing as a mortality rate? Did he mean the case fatality rate, or the infection fatality rate? If he meant the Infection mortality rate of influenza, he was pretty much bang on.

If he meant the case fatality rate, he was wrong by a factor of ten. They also have approximately the same infection fatality fate of 0. It seems that Dr Fauci just got mixed up with the terminology. You see, he did say the case fatality rate of influenza was approximately 0. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong… wrong. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. Easy mistake to make. Could have done it myself. The highest impact journal in the world — which should have the highest impact proof-readers in the world.

But clearly does not. It seems that they then compared this 0. As you probably should. So, we got Lockdown. The US used the Fauci figure and got locked down. The world used that figure and got locked down. I know it is going to be virtually impossible to walk the world back from having made such a ridiculous, stupid, mistake. There are so many reputations at stake. The entire egg production of the world will be required to supply enough yolk to cover appropriate faces. Of course, it will be denied, absolutely, vehemently, angrily, that anyone got anything wrong. It will be denied that a simple error, a mix up between case fatality and infection fatality led to this.

It will even more forcefully stated that COVID remains a deadly killer disease and that all Governments around the world have done exactly the right thing. The actions were right, the models were correct. Only those who are stupid, or incompetent cannot see it. When wrong, shout louder, get angry, double-down, attack your critics in any way possible. Accuse them of being anti-vaxx, or something of the sort. Dig for the dirt. However, just have a look, at the figures. Tell me where they are wrong — if you can. The truth is that this particular Emperor has no clothes on and is, currently, standing bollock naked, right in front of you. Hard to believe, but true. I had not spotted it. He did. All credit is his. I am simply drawing your attention to what has simply been — probably the biggest single mistake that has ever been made in the history of the world.

We have learned that people who are asymptomatic can, cannot, can, cannot, can, cannot, can… spread the virus. That the accuracy of PCR antigen testing is brilliant, useless, brilliant, useless, brilliant, useless. We also know that some people are, are not, are, are not are, naturally immune. In addition, we know that having had COVID means that you can, cannot, can, cannot, can cannot — maybe you can, frankly who knows, get it again. I think Kurt Vonnegut Junior put it best:. I like to think I have some expertise in reading medical research papers, then trying to work out what they really mean, rather than what they say they mean.

I analysed the power of money to distort research findings, in ways such that black can be magically turned into white. Of course, distortion is not just driven by money. This is only one of the factors that lays its heavy hand upon research. There are many others. The immense power of an idea to set thoughts in concrete, previous public statements made and fearing loss of authority if you change your mind. Status, power, political games, etc. Just to look at an example of actions not obviously driven by money. It will be his enduring legacy. He probably knows that his Microsoft empire will simply be a sub-paragraph in an MBA hypothesis in a hundred years. On the other hand, worldwide vaccination will secure him a place in history. Although I understand many of the forces at work to distort research, and how the manipulates are carried out, when it comes to COVID I have almost given up.

Almost everyone seems to have an agenda, twisting and turning meaning this way and that. In many cases, the end result seems to be a determined effort to inflate the mortality figures, or paint COVID as the evillest virus ever. I suspect the vaccine manufacturers have a major role to play in this. Just to give one reasonably well-known example of this. This has recently been changed. Primarily because it was so patently ridiculous that even Matt Hancock UK health secretary was no longer able to confirm that this was absolutely the correct thing to do. Although it seems he had no idea it was happening in the first place. On the other hand, other very strange things took place, in the opposite direction.

Yes, the 19 th of March. The only disease in history which has required lockdown, including the obliteration of many basic human rights, and the trashing of the entire economy. Yet it is not a disease of high consequence? This happened virtually unremarked. Very quietly, you could almost say sneakily. What on earth went on here? There may be other reasons, but I struggle to think what they may be. Wherever you looked there was confusion, and statistical manipulation, and then we moved onto the hydroxychloroquine saga.

At the very start of the pandemic I wrote a blog suggesting hydroxychloroquine could be helpful. This was based on earlier research demonstrating this drug could hamper viral entry into cells and, once within the cell, could impede viral entry into the nucleus. I even tried to get my trust to stockpile some of the drug — no chance there. Little did I know the massive storm that would erupt around this drug. A drug that has been around for decades. It is available over the counter in many countries and is, I think, the most widely used drug in India. It is primarily an anti-malarial drug — as it helps to prevent entry of the malaria parasite into cells and can hamper it breaking down haemoglobin, thus destroying red blood cells.

It is also used as an anti-inflammatory in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus SLE , where it is extraordinarily safe in the correct doses. It has been looked at as a possible anti-viral for many years. Earlier this year, I was reading various papers about it. Chloroquine is a 9-aminoquinoline known since Apart from its well-known antimalarial effects, the drug has interesting biochemical properties that might be applied against some viral infections.

Chloroquine exerts direct antiviral effects, inhibiting pH-dependent steps of the replication of several viruses including members of the flaviviruses, retroviruses, and coronaviruses. Its best-studied effects are those against HIV replication, which are being tested in clinical trials. It was clear that commercial interests were already heavily contaminating this area. Which meant that, in order to get a handle on untainted data, I went back to calmer research papers from another era. Anyway, having read around the area, it seemed that hydroxychloroquine might do some good. It was certainly pretty safe, and we had nothing else at the time. Thus, I recommended that it might be used. Then, the distorting engine was switched to full power.

Driven by two main fuel types. Type one was money. No sirree, they wanted massively expensive and almost entirely useless anti-virals to be used instead. This resulted in a study published in the Lancet, no less, slamming hydroxychloroquine through the floor. It turns out the study was almost entirely fabricated, by researchers strongly associated with various companies who, surprise, surprise, make anti-virals. If hydroxychloroquine plus zinc and azithromycin works, then there was great concern this would lower uptake of any vaccine that was developed. In addition, it would not be possible to impose emergency vaccine laws, which would make the manufacture of any vaccine far quicker and easier. If enacted, these laws mean that a vaccine does not have to be tested for safety and efficacy before use.

Just whack it out there, untested. Also, there is no possibility of suing a vaccine manufacturer if it turns out the vaccine caused serious problems. In the US, UK, and several other countries, complete legal protection against vaccine damage is already enshrined in the law, so nothing changes here. However, there is still a requirement to carry out at least some research on efficacy and safety. The EUA would remove this barrier.

Just get it out there, no questions asked, none possible. Depending on your view of the ethical standards of those companies manufacturing such vaccines, you would either welcome this move, or feel deeply disturbed. I would be in the latter camp. No way I am taking an active medication that has not been tested for either safety or efficacy. Whatever camp you are in, there are vast fortunes to be made from developing the first vaccine for COVID If all barriers to immediate uptake are removed, we have a goldrush on our hands. No need to prove your vaccine works, no need to demonstrate it is safe, no chance of being sued. Billions of dollars to be made.

What could possibly go wrong? Which takes us back to that pesky drug, hydroxychloroquine. Does it work, does it not? It seems we will never be allowed to know. Even in a hospital, such as he Henry Ford in Detroit, that appeared to be getting impressive results:. All other trials around the world have also being stopped by the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Orhanisation and the UK health authorities. This, remember, is a drug that has been taken by, literally, billions of people.

It is considered safe enough to buy over the counter, yet now it is so dangerous that it cannot even be used for research purposes. Of course, you can still take it if you have rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, malaria — or suchlike — where it remains perfectly safe and is also known to reduce inflammation a major problem with COVID. At a stroke discussion, or research, has become virtually impossible, as noted by the Henry Ford hospital in Detroit.

The health system said in the letter that it will no longer comment outside the medical community on the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat novel coronavirus. So, what have we learned? We have learned that medical science is not a pure thing — not in the slightest. We have also learned that the world of research has not come together to conquer COVID, it has split apart. Those wanting to make money, have distorted and damaged research for their own ends.

Those who want to vaccinate the world, forever, have seen a door open to the promised land. Those who wanted lockdown, are inflating the numbers of those killed. It is all a bloody horrible mess. It is said that the first casualty of war is the truth. In this case, first we killed the truth, then we killed science, then we beat inconvenient facts to death with a club. It is all extraordinarily depressing. He has also written a blog, which can be seen here. I asked if I could reproduce it on my blog as I felt it was a fascinating persepctive on what was happening in Sweden. It is also incredibly well written, in English, for someone who is Swedish. Most humbled. I hope you enjoy it. Ok, I want to preface this article by stating that it is entirely anecdotal and based on my experience working as a doctor in the emergency room of one of the big hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden, and of living as a citizen in Sweden.

As many people know, Sweden is perhaps the country that has taken the most relaxed attitude of any towards the COVID pandemic. Unlike other countries, Sweden never went in to complete lockdown. One day I was seeing people with appendicitis and kidney stones, the usual things you see in the emergency room. When I do test someone because they have a cough or a fever, the test invariably comes back negative. At the peak three months back, a hundred people were dying a day of COVID in Sweden, a country with a population of ten million.

We are now down to around five people dying per day in the whole country, and that number continues to drop. Since people generally die around three weeks after infection, that means virtually no-one is getting infected any more. If we assume around 0. And remember, the risk of dying is at the very most 1 in if you actually do get infected. And that was three weeks ago. After four months. A country with an annual death rate of around , people. That makes covid a mere blip in terms of its effect on mortality.

That is why it is nonsensical to compare covid to other major pandemics, like the pandemic that killed tens of millions of people. COVID will never even come close to those numbers. And yet many countries have shut down their entire economies, stopped children going to school, and made large portions of their population unemployed in order to deal with this disease. The media have been proclaiming that only a small percentage of the population have antibodies, and therefore it is impossible that herd immunity has developed. Why has the rate of infection dropped so precipitously? Considering that most people in Sweden are leading their lives normally now, not socially distancing, not wearing masks, there should still be high rates of infection.

The reason we test for antibodies is because it is easy and cheap. T-cells are. It is quite possible to have T-cells that are specific for covid and thereby make you immune to the disease, without having any antibodies. Personally, I think this is what has happened. Everybody who works in the emergency room where I work has had the antibody test. Very few actually have antibodies. This is in spite of being exposed to huge numbers of infected people, including at the beginning of the pandemic, before we realized how widespread COVID was, when no-one was wearing protective equipment. I am not denying that COVID is awful for the people who do get really sick or for the families of the people who die, just as it is awful for the families of people who die of cancer, or influenza, or an opioid overdose.

But the size of the response in most of the world not including Sweden has been totally disproportionate to the size of the threat. Sweden ripped the metaphorical band-aid off quickly and got the epidemic over and done with in a short amount of time, while the rest of the world has chosen to try to peel the band-aid off slowly. At present that means Sweden has one of the highest total death rates in the world. People have gone back to their normal lives and barely anyone is getting infected any more. I am willing to bet that the countries that have shut down completely will see rates spike when they open up. Shutting down completely in order to decrease the total number of deaths only makes sense if you are willing to stay shut down until a vaccine is available.

That could take years.

I Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina advantages and disadvantages of space probes kudos to RFK, Jr and his bravery regarding this and Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina vaccines issues. But the day he died, the NY Times carried Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina story, told by the doctors in Unequal America Case Study that Kennedy had Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina entrance wound in his throat, another in his right temple, and a large gaping exit wound in the back of his Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina. This Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina a misrepresentation. Parenting In Hamlet Research Paper What Is Agenda 21? Next, we witness the development of the Covid bioweapon and the quick production of a toxic vaccine to neatly finish the job. Completely moronic. Personal Narrative-We Are Moving To Argentina she is good on a computer too!